Re: suprising amtapetype error
2006-03-01 10:37:37
Jon LaBadie wrote:
I can attempt to confirm this. The tar was written before I setup
the stinit definitions. I can redo the tar using the 32K block
device and see if amtapetype -c complains.
A clarification please, Jean-Louis. Are you saying that amtapetype
only checks for previous 32K block writes or was the problem I wrote
a tape with a block size different than 32K then tried to read with
a device having a fixed block size.
amtapetype try to read a 32k block size, that will probably failed if
the bs on tape
is larger, but it should succeed if the bs on tape is smaller.
That depend of your OS/driver/drive.
Jean-Louis
|
|
|