Sebastian Kösters wrote:
> My report looks like this:
> 
> NOTES:
>   planner: tapecycle (1) <= runspercycle (10)

Please get that sorted out, I assume that this is not what you want,
although it has nothing to do with your timeouts.
> 
> Thats all. I tested with a seperate config. 

Have you increased etimeout already, as Alexander suggested?

Stefan.