Amanda-Users

Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp")

2005-05-25 15:24:35
Subject: Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp")
From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie AT rfa DOT org>
To: Alexander Jolk <alexj AT buf DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:14:44 -0400
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 05:57:43PM +0200, Alexander Jolk wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >Perhaps no postings about the specific problem,
> >but lots where the response was to use 1.13.25,
> >1.13.19, or maybe 1.14.1.  Latter one is fairly
> >new, so "my" jury is still out deliberating :)
> BTW I had run into a restoring problem with (Debian sarge's) tar-1.14, 
> due to `sparse archive members'.  As had been discussed on this list a 
> few times already, installing tar-1.15.1 fixed the problem, I could 
> restore from the existing archives without any problem.

Did you compile from source or use the debian package from sid?

-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network AT rfa DOT org.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>