Amanda-Users

Re: Dumps too big ??

2004-03-01 12:15:22
Subject: Re: Dumps too big ??
From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
To: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:11:08 +0100
Brian Cuttler wrote:

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label           Time      Size      %    Nb
  NTNWKLY26       2:56  199870.1  199.9    29


You seem to have a tapecapacity of 100 Gbyte, so amanda scheduled up
to 200 Gbyte (for 2 runtapes).  To do this it needed to do some
level 1 instead of full dumps.
But actually your tapes *are* bigger, and amanda put all the 200 GByte
on one tape only in reality.  But that was after the schedule was decided.

Are these 200 Gbyte native tapes? Change your tape definition to 200 Gbyte.
If you use hardware compression, you may put a (safe) guess what will fit on a tape, e.g. 200 Gbyte.


--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation                            Tel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit,  ZZ, :q, :q!,  M-Z, ^X^C,  logoff, logout, close, bye,  /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* kill -9 1,  Alt-F4,  Ctrl-Alt-Del,  AltGr-NumLock,  Stop-A,  ...    *
* ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
***********************************************************************


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>