Amanda-Users

Re: Where are my failes????

2003-08-17 20:50:23
Subject: Re: Where are my failes????
From: Fernando Shayani <fernando AT aen.bahai.org DOT br>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:46:11 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for helping me. I will comment below the new info:



Jon LaBadie wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:16:17AM -0300, Fernando Shayani wrote:
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>I'm having a problem with Amanda.
|>
|>I configured my Amanda to backup some FS in 1 tape... All filesystems
|>toghether are 7GB and my tape is 12GB (SONY DDS-3).
|>
|>Well, I want to make incremental backups everyday, and a full backup
|>after 7 days.
|
|
| Putting on my nasty hat, in your previous message you asked for a
| definition of an incremental backup, but you know you want them
| every day?

I need some way to backup the files on my server everyday. But I don't
think that backing up EVERYTHING everyday is good... So, I make a full
backup once (a week, or a month) and then only incremental backups
everyday. Am I correct?


|
|
|>... This is my amanda.conf file (just the relevant info).
|
|
| Just what you think relevant.  But leaving out some things I
| think are probably relevant.  If you want to leave things out
| for space considerations, best to drop comments, unused tapetypes,
| and unused dumptypes.
|
|
|>- -----------------------
|>inparallel 4
|>netusage  600 Kbps
|>
|>dumpcycle 1 weeks
|>runspercycle 0
|
|
| This says you will run amdump 0 (zero) times each week.
| I hope that is not true.

For sure, it cannot be true. I will runbg amdump all weekdays... so I
will change this value to 5. Thanks

|
|
|>tapecycle 1 tapes
|
|
| This says you only have one tape to use.
| I hope that is not true.

Well. Thanks almost true. I have 2 tapes...
But let me understand. What is the problem to have only 1 tape, if the
tape have more space than the FS?

|
|
|>bumpsize 20 Mb
|>bumpdays 1
|>bumpmult 4
|
|
| With a tape larger than your data, these defaults can be left alone.
|
|
|>etimeout 300
|>
|>runtapes 1
|>
|>tapedev "/dev/tape"
|
|
| Is this a "NO-rewind on close" device?  It must be!
| Usually there is an "n" somewhere in the device name
| for the no-rewind version of the device.

I don't know about it. My device is SONY SDT-9000R. Do you know it? And
why is important to be NO REWIND ON CLOSE?

|
|
|>tapetype SONY-DDS3
|>labelstr "DIARIO"
|
|
| This label string says every tape you have to use will be
| labeled exactly "DIARIO".  That doesn't let amanda distinguish
| one tape from the next.  I fear that you really do think you
| can do backups with a single tape.

You were correct. I though that could be possible to backup with one
tape (as I said, the tape is bigger than the FS).
So, How many tapes should I need? And why?

|
|
|>holdingdisk hd1 {
|>~    comment "main holding disk"
|>~    directory "/var/tmp"
|>~    use 2000 Mb
|>}
|>- --------------------------------------------------------
|>
|>The problem is: I receive the report everyday saying the backup was
|>made, but I cannot locate any file!!!
|>I run amrecover, set the host, set the disk, I can see the directoryes,
|>but they are all empty! I'm pasting the last REPORT here:
|
|
| Do you have indexing turned on?  (one of those missing "irrelevant infos")

The INDEX was written twice!
define dumptype media-tar {
~        index yes
~        program "GNUTAR"
~        comment "Prioridade Media - TAR"
~        compress client best
~        index
~        priority medium

Now I corrected the problem and removed the last "index" term. Hope it
works now.

|
| What version of tar are you using.  This is one possible symptom of a
| buggy tar (tar --version).  Try for either 1.13.25 or 1.13.19 (not 1.13).
|
|

tar 1.13.25 (RedHat 9)


|>These dumps were to tape DIARIO.
|>The next tape Amanda expects to use is: DIARIO.
|
|
| Yup, looks like only one tape.
| Honest, that is not a good idea.
| Each run of amdump overwrites the previous run on the tape.

OHHH!!! I though that it would be written on the tape AFTER the last
backup!!!!!!!!!! That's why I though that I could backup with only one
tape!!!
I cannot buy a lot of tapes... In Brazil it's expensive! Do you have any
idea of a solution for 2 tapes? Maybe 3 or 4?


|
|
|>STATISTICS:
|>~                          Total       Full      Daily
|>~                        --------   --------   --------
|>Estimate Time (hrs:min)    0:00
|>Run Time (hrs:min)         0:11
|>Dump Time (hrs:min)        0:04       0:03       0:00
|>Output Size (meg)         508.0      501.8        6.2
|>Original Size (meg)       564.4      554.2       10.1
|>Avg Compressed Size (%)    90.0       90.5       61.3   (level:#disks ...)
|>Filesystems Dumped           13          2         11   (1:8 2:3)
|
|
| As amanda was designed to do, on each run of amdump, it is giving you
| a mixture of level 0 (aka full dumps) for some FS's (aka DLE's or
| DiskListEntries), and some higher levels (eight level 1's and three
| level 2's, aka incrementals) for the other DLE's.
|
| With amanda's scheduling scheme, and your settings assuming runspercycle
| is really 7, amanda will try to backup about 1/7th of your data each run
| so it should average about 1GB/run.  However, with so few DLE's, on a
| day to day basis the amount of data backed up will bounce around somewhat.
|
| So it looks like amanda is doing its thing correctly.
| But I still fear that each run of amdump is trashing your previous run.
|
|
|>Avg Dump Rate (k/s)      2424.4     2662.4      295.0
|>
|>Tape Time (hrs:min)        0:09       0:08       0:01
|>Tape Size (meg)           508.7      501.9        6.8
|>Tape Used (%)               4.4        4.3        0.1   (level:#disks ...)
|>Filesystems Taped            13          2         11   (1:8 2:3)
|>Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)   978.4     1128.1       91.2
|>
|>
|>NOTES:
|>~  planner: Incremental of sedenet:/SEDENET/psts bumped to level 2.
|>~  planner: Incremental of sedenet:/SEDENET/groups/secext bumped to
level 2.
|>~  planner: Incremental of sedenet:/SEDENET/groups/secnac bumped to
level 2.
|
|
| There were a lot of changes on these DLE's so it was more efficient to
| backup just the changes from the last level 1 rather than the last
level 0.
| Thus these backups were "bumped" to level 2.
|
|
|>~  planner: Full dump of sedenet:/SEDENET/fotos promoted from 4 days
ahead.
|>~  planner: Full dump of sedenet:/home promoted from 4 days ahead.
|
|
| In trying to balance the daily dumps to that 1GB/day I mentioned, amanda
| decided to do a level 0 of these DLE's earlier that required by your
setting
| of a 1 week dumpcycle.
|
|
|>~  taper: tape DIARIO kb 520928 fm 13 [OK]
|
|
| 13 DLE's were sent to this tape (fm 13 == file marks).
| The total data sent to the tape was 0.52 GB (post software compression).
|
|
|>DUMP SUMMARY:
|>~                                     DUMPER STATS            TAPER STATS
|>HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s
|>- -------------------------- ---------------------------------
- ------------
|>sedenet      -ENET/fotos 0  351290 341728  97.3   2:052737.4   5:001140.3
|>sedenet      -oups/ascom 1     270     96  35.6   0:00 246.1   0:02  49.4
|>sedenet      -groups/cnp 1     140     64  45.7   0:00 207.4   0:14   4.7
|>sedenet      -roups/info 1      10     64 640.0   0:00   0.0   0:02  32.8
|>sedenet      -ups/secext 2     830    192  23.1   0:00 313.9   0:18  10.5
|>sedenet      -ups/secnac 2     810    224  27.7   0:01 239.1   0:02  92.3
|>sedenet      -ups/tesnac 1     260     96  36.9   0:00  97.1   0:12   7.8
|>sedenet      -DENET/psts 2      40     64 160.0   0:00  40.1   0:02  28.3
|>sedenet      /home       0  216220 172192  79.6   1:082525.0   2:361104.5
|
|
| Check out the columnspec settings to adjust your column widths.
|
|
|>sedenet      -ysql/ponto 1      10     64 640.0   0:00   0.0   0:13   5.0
|>sedenet      -mysql/siri 1      10     64 640.0   0:00   0.0   0:02  27.3
|>web.aen.baha /home/www   1     120     64  53.3   0:01  11.8   0:02  32.8
|>web.aen.baha -spool/mail 1    7890   6016  76.2   0:19 311.4   0:07 855.6
|>
|>(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.3)
|>- ----------------
|>
|>Can anyone help me understand it? What happend???
|
|
| HTH, generally looks good.
|
THANKS A LOT!!!

Fernando

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/QCHTRXgceJ3LQMIRAuKzAKCl2WFuw8kyy7GyrZu/u0lB0AWMuwCgilT1
2SWx2fHBRQPozEzTgmYPndM=
=035/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>