On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 at 9:38am, Terri Eads wrote
> So I think I'll use that one. I may rerun it with the hardware
> compression off to see what that does, but it looks like amtapetype
> is giving better results.
amtapetype=tapetype -- it just got renamed.
And you *never* want to run (am)tapetype with hardware compression.
(am)tapetype uses /dev/random (or equivalent) as a data source, and random
data does not compress.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|