Re: tapelist and tape order
2003-01-25 19:24:51
>Amazing but true, occasionally I fail to read my reports each morning
>``sla>p''
>(that was me slapping myself in the face).
:-) :-)
>Are there undesired consequences to reordering the tapelist now,
>placing the example tape 4 between tapes 3 & 5 with the same date as tape 5?
I don't think so. I don't thing anything (such as amrecover and friends)
other than the "which one is next" code look at the tapelist file.
You should be able to go ahead and reorder things now and they should
sink down to the bottom of the file, at which point "the right thing"
will happen and order will be re-established.
Note, however, my *strong* suggestion that you make a copy of the file
first. If I'm wrong, I can still say "I told you so" :-).
>Jon H. LaBadie
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, jrj AT purdue DOT edu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, (continued)
- Re: tapelist and tape order, John R. Jackson
- Re: tapelist and tape order, Jon LaBadie
- Re: tapelist and tape order,
John R. Jackson <=
- Re: tapelist and tape order, Jean-Louis Martineau
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Deb Baddorf
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Three-*run* dumpcycle [was: Full Backup Configuration], Jay Lessert
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Chris Karakas
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Chris Karakas
- Re: Full Backup Configuration, Jon LaBadie
RE: Full Backup Configuration, Keith Nasman
|
|
|