On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 04:12:52PM +0200, Edwin Hakkennes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are also using a big holding disk, and I would like amflush not to erase
> the
> files on disk. That way, a restore can be done much quicker, provided that
> the
> harddisk is still working. Amamda seems capable of backup to disk as well as
> to tape. I would like to use both in a redundant scheme.
>
> Does anybody have any experience with this?
>
> (I can copy the files before flushing them, (cp -l) but then amanda doesn't
> know about the disk-files anymore an cannot use them for a restore.
<OT curiosity>Why do you call it copying when you are making links?</OT
curiosity>
<OT curiosity>Why does gnu cp have this obfuscating option?</OT curiosity>
Never tried it, but if you restore the links to their original names and
locations would amrestore/amrecover use them? I'm guessing not as the
indexes would say they were on tape.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|