[ADSM-L] Trying again

Subject:	[ADSM-L] Trying again
From:	"Schaub, Steve" <Steve_Schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:35:36 +0000

Didn't see a response to this so I'm trying one more time, cause I think 
someone out there knows the answer.

We have 6 Netapp fileshares that have a small number of large files but TB 
daily change rates.
When Snapdiff runs, we are not seeing the number of sessions we expect after 
setting resourceutilization=10.
Is this due to how TSM is receiving the changed file list from the Netapp?
Would we be better off forcing CreateNewBase=yes on every run to increase 
multi-threading?
Thanks,
-steve



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] Trying again, Schaub, Steve <= Re: [ADSM-L] Trying again, Erwann SIMON Re: [ADSM-L] Trying again, Schaub, Steve

Previous by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] Influencing order of VM backup., Harris, Steven
Next by Date:	[ADSM-L] Certificate chaining error, Tommaso Bollini
Previous by Thread:	[ADSM-L] SnapDiff threading question, Schaub, Steve
Next by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] Trying again, Erwann SIMON
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]