Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??
2015-02-13 11:54:40
Hello,
please keep us posted.
I will have to go from 6.3.4-300 to a higher version because of the NDMP
dump > 2TB overwrite problem...
Bye
Rainer
On 13.02.2015 17:05, Rhodes, Richard L. wrote:
> Yea. I opened a Sev 1.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Raibeck
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:57 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Off-hand I am not sure what the problem is, I think it would be a good idea
> to open a PMR if you have not already done so.
>
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
> storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
> Product support:
> http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager
>
> Online documentation:
> http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/welcome
> Product Wiki:
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 2015-02-13
> 10:41:55:
>
>> From: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Date: 2015-02-13 10:44
>> Subject: FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??
>> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>>
>> Now this is really weird.
>>
>> TSM came up after we rebooted. But it threw a bunch of ANR9999 msgs,
>> then QUIT LOGGING. It seems to be running - I go onto a server and
>> did a incr bkup, but nothing is logging in the actlog.
>>
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D_2891663292 GetDomainByNodeId
>> (pmcache.c:2645) Thread<280>: Node id 626 not found in table
>> Policy.Domain.Members. (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> issued message 9999
>> from: (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010001ca7c
>> StdPutText (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010001d514
>> OutDiagToCons (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000090bc
>> outDiagfExt (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001004bf254
>> GetDomainByNodeId (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001004beeec
>> pmOpenDomain (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001006ac78c
>> BeginVbTxn (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001006a4068
>> SmNodeSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010053ca64
>> SmSchedSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001005525d8
>> HandleNodeSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100549c54
>> DoNodeSched (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100544900
>> smExecuteSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100078a7c
>> psSessionThread (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010000c264
>> StartThread (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D_3095886799 HandleShortCircuitCodes
>> (dbieval.c:1072) Thread<280>: Invalid handle used from tbtbl.c
>> (10153). (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> issued message 9999
>> from: (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010001ca7c
>> StdPutText (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010001d514
>> OutDiagToCons (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000090bc
>> outDiagfExt (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000cbb28
>> HandleShortCircuitCodes (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000cb0a0
>> DbiEvalSQLOutcomeX (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000a0a18
>> TblClose (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010019b13c
>> FreeTxnDesc (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010019af14
>> dbiEndTxn (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001000458bc
>> DoEndFuncCallbacks (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100045d70
>> tmAbortX (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001004bef60
>> pmOpenDomain (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001006ac78c
>> BeginVbTxn (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001006a4068
>> SmNodeSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010053ca64
>> SmSchedSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x00000001005525d8
>> HandleNodeSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100549c54
>> DoNodeSched (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100544900
>> smExecuteSession (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x0000000100078a7c
>> psSessionThread (SESSION: 125)
>> 02/13/15 10:00:22 ANR9999D Thread<280> 0x000000010000c264
>> StartThread (SESSION: 125)
>>
>> It then threw this error and STOPPED LOGGING into actlog.
>>
>> 02/13/15 10:03:24 ANR0103E admattrm.c(806): Error 2332
>> updating row in table "Global.Attributes".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Rhodes, Richard L.
>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:49 AM
>> To: adsm-l mailing list (ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU)
>> Subject: v6.3.5 hung db2??
>>
>> Two days ago we upgrade one of our TSM instances to v6.3.5 (from v6.3.4).
>> This is our first v6.3.5 instance. It runs on a AIX server.
>>
>> Last night at 19:32 it looks like DB2 went into some kind of a loop.
>> The instance became unresponsive. Dsmadmc cmds hung (didn't error,
>> just hung).
>> Dsmserv process was getting almost no cpu, while ds2sync was running the
> box
>> At 65-70% but had no disk I/O. I killed dsmserv, but db2 didn't go down.
>> I tried db2stop but it did nothing. Finally rebooted to get everything
> up.
>> The actlog shows no nasty errors.
>>
>> Just wondering if anyone else has had a runaway db2.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
>> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that you have received this document in error and
>> that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
>> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the
>> original message.
>>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
> and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering
> it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
> copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original
> message.
>
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??,
Rainer Tammer <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Diego Fidalgo
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Mitchell, Ruth Slovik
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, DeGroat, Steve
- Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
- [ADSM-L] FW: FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
|
|
|