ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.1 TDP for Exchange 2010 backup Task Details not updated?

2015-02-03 07:25:13
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.1 TDP for Exchange 2010 backup Task Details not updated?
From: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:23:11 -0500
Hello Wanda,

This changed when full remote PowerShell management support was added.
The backup progress timer was added and will be available in the next
DP/Exchange PTF.

Del

----------------------------------------------------


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 02/02/2015
08:20:08 PM:

> From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date: 02/02/2015 08:20 PM
> Subject: 7.1.1 TDP for Exchange 2010 backup Task Details not updated?
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
> TSM 6.3.4 on Win2k8-64
> Exchange 2010 on Win2k8 64
>
> This is not a show-stopper, just in the "annoying and mysterious"
category.
>
> Installed Exchange 7.1.1 TDP for a customer today.
> The beautiful FCM interface popped in all the pre-reqs, VSS testing
> ran, I set the appropriate passwords and proxy relationships, full
> backup kicked off via the GUI ran like a champ.
>
> But in the GUI, in the Task List pane, you used to be able to hover
> over the "WORKING" line and see that the backup was actually
> running, or click the Task Details tab and see how many GB have
> moved so far.  It was cool and the Exchange guys could see progress
> (especially important for big restores) without needing access to a
> TSM server admin account to monitor from the server end.
>
> In this case the full backup ran over an hour, and there was never
> any updated information in the Task List or the Task Details until
> we got "completed".
> Anybody else see this or figured out why?  Am I missing some java
thingy?
>
> Thanks
>
> Wanda Prather
> TSM Consultant
> ICF International Enterprise and Cybersecurity Systems Division
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>