ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes

2014-07-15 23:07:54
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
From: Ron Delaware <ron.delaware AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:05:49 -0700
Steven,

The logical volumes are not dedicated disks in most cases, which means that other applications may be using the same disks at the same time. With our new "TSM Server Blueprint" standards, TSM database's over 1TB require 16 luns.

You can go to this link to find out more

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/NEW%20-%20Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager%20Blueprint%20-%20%20Improve%20the%20time-to-value%20of%20your%20deployments

 

Best Regards,

_________________________________________________________
Ronald C. Delaware

IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert
IBM Corporation | Tivoli Software
IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage
IBM Certified Deployment Professional
Butterfly Solutions Professional
916-458-5726 (Office
925-457-9221 (cell phone)

email: ron.delaware AT us.ibm DOT com
Storage Services Offerings

 



From:        Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>
To:        ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Date:        07/15/2014 06:55 PM
Subject:        [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>





Hi,

I've specced a design for a new TSM server and as recommended have
specified multiple luns for the database.  The folklore is that DB2 will
start one thread per lun so for a big database you use 8 luns and hence get
8 threads.

My AIX guy is asking whether I really need 8 luns or will 8 AIX logical
volumes have the same effect.

Does anyone know or can tell me where to look?

Thanks

Steve.

Steven Harris
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>