Re: [ADSM-L] ANS1809W-messages using shared memory communication?
2014-07-08 12:32:27
From the manual for AIX
The user data limit that is displayed
when you issue the ulimit -d command is the soft user data limit. It is
not necessary to set the hard user data limit for DB2. The default soft
user data limit is 128 MB. This is equivalent to the value of 262,144 512-byte
units as set in /etc/security/limits folder, or 131,072 KB units as displayed
by the ulimit -d command. This setting limits private memory usage to about
one half of what is available in the 256 MB private memory segment available
for a 32-bit process on AIX.
Note: A
DB2 server instance cannot make use of the Large Address Space or of very
large address space AIX 32-bit memory models due to shared memory requirements.
On some systems, for example those requiring large amounts of sort memory
for performance, it is best to increase the user data limit to allow DB2
to allocate more than 128 MB of memory in a single process.
You can set the user data memory
limit to "unlimited" (a value of "-1"). This setting
is not recommended for 32-bit DB2 because it allows the data region to
overwrite the stack, which grows downward from the top of the 256 MB private
memory segment. The result would typically be to cause the database to
end abnormally. It is, however, an acceptable setting for 64-bit DB2 because
the data region and stack are allocated in separate areas of the very large
address space available to 64-bit AIX processes.
Best Regards,
_________________________________________________________
Ronald C. Delaware
IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert
IBM Corporation | Tivoli Software
IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage
IBM Certified Deployment Professional
Butterfly Solutions Professional
916-458-5726 (Office
925-457-9221 (cell phone)
email: ron.delaware AT us.ibm DOT com
Storage
Services Offerings
From:
"Sims, Richard
B" <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
To:
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Date:
07/08/2014 04:50 AM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L]
ANS1809W-messages using shared memory communication?
Sent by:
"ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
There can be other causes of this message, such as
preemption by higher priority tasks (particularly restores, retrieves,
and recalls). See what the server Activity Log contains at the time that
the client encountered its error, and examine the log prior to that for
resource consumption (drives, etc.) by other sessions or processes leading
up to the problem for the affected backup session. If you are using disk
storage pools for arriving data, insufficient sizing can result in filling
and then an elevated demand for tape drive resources and thus contention
and delays. I would also inspect the client logs to see if client processing
got mired such that even a 60 minute Idletimeout would have been exceeded.
Richard Sims
|
|
|