ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!?

2013-12-03 11:30:22
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!?
From: Nick Laflamme <nick AT LAFLAMME DOT US>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:27:56 -0600
Ok, thanks. It looks like we're dealing with some non-technical issue here.

Thanks for the validation,
Nick

On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, Ehresman,David E. wrote:

> In the "Client-acceptor scheduler services versus the traditional
> scheduler Services" section on page 225 of the
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Windows Backup-Archive
> Clients
> Version 6.4
> Installation and User's Guide
>
>  It says "Generally, using the client acceptor daemon to manage the
> scheduler is the preferred method."
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
> <javascript:;>]
> On Behalf Of Schneider, Jim
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 11:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <javascript:;>
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!?
>
> Nick,
>
> The 6.2 Windows Backup/Archive Installation and User's Guide, page 209,
> says dsmcad is the preferred scheduling method.  Also, Tivoli Storage
> Manager traditional scheduler services "Requires higher use of system
> resources when idle" and "Restart the traditional scheduler periodically to
> free system resources previously used by system calls."
>
> The scheduler service has a memory leak.  It is unlikely that DSMCAD is
> deprecated.
>
> Jim Schneider
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
> <javascript:;>]
> On Behalf Of Nick Laflamme
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:28 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <javascript:;>
> Subject: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!?
>
> A colleague insists that TSM service once told him that DSMCAD would be
> deprecated and that we need to convert to using the TSM Scheduler routinely.
>
> The TSM 6.3 client manuals, however, refer to both techniques as valid
> choices.
>
> Has anyone ever been told by IBM that DSMCAD had been or will be
> deprecated, either in general or in very specific cases?
>
> Alternately, can anyone point to current IBM recommendations in favor of
> DSMCAD?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> **********************************************************************
> Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments
> thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the
> sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of
> its content to any other person.
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>