[ADSM-L] Deduplication/replication options
2013-07-23 13:21:44
Hello all,
We're currently faced with a decision go with a dedupe storage array or with
TSM dedupe for our backup storage targets. There are some very critical pros
and cons going with one or the other. For example, TSM dedupe will reduce
overall network throughput both for backups and replication (source-side dedupe
would be used). A dedupe storage array won't do that for backup, but it would
be possible if we replicated to an identical array (but TSM replication would
be bandwidth intensive). TSM dedupe might not scale as well and may
neccessitate more TSM servers to distribute the load. Overall, though, I think
the cost of additional servers is way less than what a native dedupe array
would cost so I don't think that's a big hit.
Replication is key. We have two datacenters where I would love it if TSM
replication could be used in order to quickly (still manually, though) activate
the replication server for production if necessary. Having a dedupe storage
array kind of removes that option, unless we want to replicate the whole
rehydrated backup data via TSM.
I'm going on and on here, but has anybody had to make a decision to go one way
or the other? Would it make sense to do a hybrid deployment (combination of TSM
Dedupe and Array dedupe)? Any thoughts or tales of woes and forewarnings are
appreciated.
Thanks!
Sergio
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] Deduplication/replication options,
Sergio O. Fuentes <=
|
|
|