ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-17 21:47:14
Subject: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be
From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:45:04 +0000
TSM 6.2.3
Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0.

VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk.  That pool has no 
NEXTSTGPOOL defined.

VMMC points backup data to a deduplicated sequential pool on fast disk storage.
After the server dedups it there, it migrates to a slower NAS-based 
deduplicated storage pool on disk.
When that slower pool fills, data migrates out to tape.
DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP set to YES.
(No client-side dedup used.)

We have done full VM restores through the plug-in and file-level restores 
through the recovery agent in the past,
including testing restores from tape, with no problems.

Now one of the customer's VM datastores has met with an unfortunate accident in 
a dark alley.
We need to restore 7 full VM's.

>From the dsmc command line, restore vm victim1  datastore=newhealthyone starts 
>up OK, but was calling for a zillion tape mounts, and therefore was restoring 
>at the rate of about 4GB per 24 hours.

So, we did MOVE NODEDATA DCNAME FILESPACE=victim1 to bring the data from the 
tape back to the sequential disk pool.
Cranked up again, same result - requesting a zillion tape mounts.

So riddle me this:
If the control information is on disk, and the filespace is back on disk, what 
are the tape mounts going after?

(FWIW, tried upgrading VE to 6.4.0.1 and data mover to 6.4.0.4, no difference.)
Signed,
Confused by VE.  Again.

Wanda Prather  |  Senior Technical Specialist  | Wanda.Prather AT icfi DOT com  
|  www.icfi.com
ICF International  | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 
410.539.1135 (o)