ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool

2012-08-27 18:56:59
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool
From: "Clark, Margaret" <MClark AT SDDPC DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:53:47 +0000
We have been using NetApp storage for TSM primary disk pools for about a year 
now.  
The only problem we experienced was when we first configured the storage, and 
it did not mount automatically after a reboot.  (It does now.)
It isn't obviously slower than the attached storage, but since we must have the 
space, I haven't looked too carefully...
- Margaret Clark

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Mayhew, James
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:28 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NetApp for Primary Disk Pool

BUMP... Does anyone have thoughts on this?

From: Mayhew, James
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:42 PM
To: 'ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu'
Subject: NetApp for Primary Disk Pool

Hello All,

We are considering using a NetApp V6210 with some attached shelves as a block 
storage TSM primary disk pool. Do any of you have any experience using NetApp 
storage as a TSM primary disk pool? If so, how was your experience with this 
solution? Did you have any performance issues? How was it with sequential 
workloads? Any insight that you all can provide is greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

James Mayhew
Storage Engineer
HealthPlan Services
E-mail: jmayhew AT healthplan DOT com


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.This email 
transmission may contain confidential information.This information is intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if 
addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the 
intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance.