ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM V6 tape labels

2012-06-28 09:48:45
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM V6 tape labels
From: "Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT" <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:24:05 -0500
I may be wrong, but the only way I know to divide media is by device class, so 
I do not think you can do it in 1 library with 1 drive type.
Why the concern about using 1 pool of media for both primary and copy?  DRM 
will take care of what tapes go where.

Andy Huebner

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Victor Shum
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 2:24 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM V6 tape labels

Dear All :



I am implementing a TSM V6 EE on AIX with IBM TS3200 with 4 x LTO5 drive.
Is it any easy way that I can use different LTO-barcode labeling scheme for
primary and copy pool ?



My concerns is : DRM will be implement to handle offsite tape cycling, when
offsite tape media back to the Tape library; it shall become "scratch" type.
So I concerns those tape may be reused by the primary pool.  So it seems
that cannot use different tape labeling scheme for primary and copy pool..



e.g. BON000 ~ BON999 label will be used for primary pool tape media;  BOF000
~ BOF999 labels will be used for all copypool..



Best regards,

Victor Shum

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>