ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] AIX DST patch: anyone else apply?

2012-03-06 13:07:46
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AIX DST patch: anyone else apply?
From: "Lamb, Charles P." <cplamb AT NPPD DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:01:22 -0600
See 
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1013017&myns=pwraix61&myne=E

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Ben Bullock
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:41 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AIX DST patch: anyone else apply?

Hmm, this is the first I've heard about a new DST issue. Anybody have an APAR 
or a link to more information?

Thanks,
Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Lamb, Charles P.
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:06 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AIX DST patch: anyone else apply?

Hi.......

Yes, we received the DST notification for AIX V6/V7 late Friday, 2 March 2012.  
Our AIX consultant had us use the Olsen environment and we re-booted our AIX 
V6.1 servers.  Since we are late on AIX migration from AIX v5.3.12.3 to AIX 
v6.1.7.1/3, we only had six AIX servers to modify.  Two of them are TSM systems 
(PROD & TEST).  BTW, the notification said to re-boot AIX servers by midnight 6 
March 2012 for the DST fix to work!!!

Our AIX V6.1 servers shows:

# echo $TZ
America/Chicago

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Robert Talda
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:51 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] AIX DST patch: anyone else apply?

Folks:
  A little late, but we are curious.

  We are running 10 TSM servers (v6.2.3.0) on 2 IBM Power 550s running AIX
6.1 TL7 SP1. 

  Over the weekend, we got notified of a bug in the DST processing (apparently 
introduced via a coding change in the last year).  After considerable head 
scratching, we decided to apply the eFix because we had no way to 
verify/guarantee that all of our applications were using the default TZ (which 
was "EST5EDT" - not a custom value, and thus not at risk from the bug).

  Did other see this alert and chose to apply?  Or ignore?

----
Robert Talda
EZ-Backup Team, CIT/Systems & Operations Cornell University rpt4 AT cornell DOT 
edu
607-255-8280

The BCI Email Firewall made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*Confidentiality Notice: 

This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received
this communication in error, please do not distribute, and
delete the original message. 

Thank you for your compliance.

You may contact us at:
Blue Cross of Idaho 
3000 E. Pine Ave.
Meridian, Idaho 83642
1.208.345.4550

---------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>