Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
2011-12-15 07:24:00
On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote:
> Its been a long time since I've worked with 3494's. But I don't think you
> even have to partition them. You just have to use different category codes
> for the different systems.
>
> An old dog,
> David
Quite so. The 3494 has historically benefitted from having an embedded library
manager, unlike "SCSI" libraries, and can do a lot without the need for a TSM
Library Manager and that added complexity.
Richard Sims
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Lee, Gary D.
- [ADSM-L] Ang: 3494 library questions, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Steven Langdale
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Steven Langdale
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Ehresman,David E.
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions,
Richard Sims <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Lee, Gary D.
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Ehresman,David E.
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Steven Langdale
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Lee, Gary D.
- Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions, Steven Langdale
- [ADSM-L] Simple include (probably), Minns, Farren - Chichester
- Re: [ADSM-L] Simple include (probably), Theo Brettschneider
- Re: [ADSM-L] Simple include (probably), Steven Langdale
- Re: [ADSM-L] Simple include (probably), Richard Sims
- Re: [ADSM-L] Simple include (probably), Minns, Farren - Chichester
|
|
|