ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-10-17 09:09:57
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
From: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:54:11 -0400
On 10/14/2011 04:47 PM, Prather, Wanda wrote:

I have 2 others (smaller DB's ) that I've converted from production
5.5 to 6.2, and have no qualms about recommending it to anybody
(assuming the server hardware has the required memory).  It's been
stable for them.

Please elaborate on your experiences w.r.t. memory footprint?

It's my major planning unknown; I'm musing about instance count
vs. size.


- Allen S. Rout

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>