I think the biggest problem with any replication method is consistency. With 
synchronous replication, this might not be a problem, and with asynchronous 
replication, yo might get lucky if your consistency groups are well defined.

I'll be giving a presentation about TSM version 6 fail-over at the TSM 
symposium in a few weeks time. I'd think that quite a bit of the information in 
that presentation will be quite useful for what you want....

On 31 aug. 2011, at 20:23, Shawn Drew wrote:

> Last year there was a short discussion on TSM 6.1 and hardware replication
> (SVC/SRDF/etc) but I can't find if there was any consensus.
> 
> I know HADR is the officially supported replication option, but is there
> anyone successfully using any of these block replication for TSM6 ?
> Any tricks to it or docs that I can be pointed to?
> 
> Regards,
> Shawn
> ________________________________________________
> Shawn Drew
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
> the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
> please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
> with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
> is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
> integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
> not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
> functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, 
> Inc.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622