ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?

2011-06-16 09:36:41
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?
From: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:31:51 -0400
Are you backing up System State?  They changed how this works (I think in 
6.2.?), which puts more processing on the client side and allows server-side 
expiration to run more quickly.  I can confirm that the server-side expiration 
does indeed run much more quickly for System State backups.  We've not been 
able to quantitatively measure the impact on the client side.

At 12:32 AM 6/16/2011, you wrote:
>Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b 
>confirm for me that you are running OK?
>
>Have a customer who did the conversion from V5 on Win2K3 32b  to V6.2.2.2 on 
>Win2K8 64b and new server hardware.  Performance is measurably degraded.  
>Background processes are slower by 10-18%; client backups are showing commwait 
>increased by an order of magnitude.
>
>I'm suspecting it's in the hardware config somewhere, but can't find it.  If 
>anybody can confirm upgrade success on Win2K8 64b I would appreciate it before 
>I go upgrade anyone to this level.   :>)
>
>Thanks!
>
>Wanda Prather  |  Senior Technical Specialist  | wprather AT icfi DOT 
>com<mailto:wprather AT icfi DOT com>  |  www.jasi.com<www.jasi.com%20>
>ICF Jacob & Sundstrom  | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 
>410.539.1135


--
Paul Zarnowski                            Ph: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services                 Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801    Em: psz1 AT cornell DOT edu