ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] inconsistencies between tsm and tape labels

2011-01-25 15:06:21
Subject: [ADSM-L] inconsistencies between tsm and tape labels
From: Tim Brown <tbrown AT CENHUD DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:05:35 -0500
Have a tape A00521 which TSM states is part of stgpool nt_tape

It was last written on 12/28/2010. During last reclaim we got an 813 abend
in Z/OS

IEC149I 813-04,IFG0195H,ADSM,SERVER,SYS01467,0911,A00521,NT.BFS,
LBL=OMSC.BFS
T01D10E Close Bypassed/NOT processed, Open NOT seen: Vol=A00521,
Fseq=00001
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 522
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=813  REASON CODE=00000004

The actual tape label is OMSC.BFS, we are not sure what caused this.

Is there anything we can due to save the data. If we try to move it to another
volume we will probably get the same 813 error.

Is thereany way in TSM to override and use Bypass Label Processsing
I dont think this is possible but I want to ask anyway.


Thanks

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbrown AT cenhud DOT com <<mailto:tbrown AT cenhud DOT com>>
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ADSM-L] inconsistencies between tsm and tape labels, Tim Brown <=