ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB

2010-12-17 20:23:36
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB
From: Maurice van 't Loo <maurice AT BACKITUP DOT NU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:22:27 +0100 
Hi Wolfgang,

Just to be sure, isn't <800GB just because data is expired? See if you have
reclaimable space on the tape.

Regards,
Maurice

2010/12/9 Wolfgang J Moeller <moeller AT gwdg DOT de>

> Among the (currently) 1170 full ULTRIUM4C tapes around here,
> with a wide variety of data, I see anything between "526.1 G" and "6.1 T".
>
> What I don't like: 20 % of the tapes are shown with a capacity of < 800 MB,
> but only 3.5 % with 1.6 TB or more. This seemed to be different with LTO3 -
> unfortunately I didn't keep notes about the statistics back then.
>
> Best regards,
>
>        Wolfgang J. Moeller <moeller AT gwdg DOT de>
>
> Tel. +49 551 201-1516 ... not representing ... GWDG, Goettingen, Germany
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange 2010 Backup error: WinRM, Bill Boyer
Next by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange 2010 Backup error: WinRM, Meunier, Yann
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Wolfgang J Moeller
Next by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Scott McCambly
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]