Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV

ADSM-L

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV

2010-09-29 09:37:09

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV
From:	Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:35:43 +0200

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Matthew Glanville <
matthew.glanville AT kodak DOT com> wrote:

> Remco,
>  You  mention you are having performance problems with IBM XIV and 'DISK'
> pools, how is the performance with 'FILE' based storage pools?
>
> Matthew Glanville
>

I have not tested with FILE yet, so I can't say. As for now, FILE is not an
option in our production environment, so I've not really bothered to spend
time on it.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post, PLCS

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Bruce T. Harvey Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, David E Ehresman Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Strand, Neil B. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Lakshminarayanan, Rajesh Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Strand, Neil B. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Matthew Glanville Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post <= Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Lloyd Dieter Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Grigori Solonovitch Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Grigori Solonovitch Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Mehdi Salehi Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Richard Rhodes Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Orville Lantto

Previous by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Matthew Glanville
Next by Date:	[ADSM-L] tivoli.tivguid, David E Ehresman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Matthew Glanville
Next by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Lloyd Dieter
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]