Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV

ADSM-L

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV

2010-09-29 08:46:00

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV
From:	Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:44:34 +0200

How nice. Fortunately, we have an entire (redundant) fabric dedicated to
TSM, and only have on initiator in each zone.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Strand, Neil B. <NBStrand AT leggmason DOT 
com>wrote:

> Something we have noticed is that when an AIX server is zoned to the
> same FC port(s) on the storage device as a windows or Linux server, the
> AIX server tends to have reduced throughput when both servers are
> accessing the storage.  It appears that the AIX is given a lower
> priority of service.  I have observed this on NetApp and XIV attached to
> Cisco fabrics but have not had time to really dig into it.
>

--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post, PLCS

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Bruce T. Harvey Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, David E Ehresman Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Strand, Neil B. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post <= Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Lakshminarayanan, Rajesh Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Strand, Neil B. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Matthew Glanville Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Lloyd Dieter Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Grigori Solonovitch Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Grigori Solonovitch Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] [adsm] TSM and XIV, Mehdi Salehi

Previous by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Remco Post
Next by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Lakshminarayanan, Rajesh
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Strand, Neil B.
Next by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and XIV, Lakshminarayanan, Rajesh
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]