ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] Fw: Question on include/exclude and Journal

2010-06-09 14:17:11
Subject: [ADSM-L] Fw: Question on include/exclude and Journal
From: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:14:44 -0400
The exclude processing the journal daemon employs is a subset of the
exclude processing the backup client provides.

Some primary differences between journal exclude processing and backup
client
exclude processing are that journal exclude processing doesn't support
Exclude.Dir
nor does it support Include statements.

In general many exclude statements shouldn't not increase the likelihood
of
buffer overflow errors on Windows.

Objects are excluded soon after the file system notification is received
by the
journal daemon and excluding the object prevents journal entries from
being
added or updated.

The amount of processing required to exclude the objects (basically all
done in memory )
 is much less than the processing required to update the journal (i/o,
etc.) so excluding objects
which change frequently probably is more likely to decrease the likelihood
of buffer overflows

Hope this helps .....

Regards,


Pete Tanenhaus
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
email: tanenhau AT us.ibm DOT com
tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213

"Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it"


---------------------- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on
06/09/2010 02:05 PM ---------------------------
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
To:     ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
cc:
Subject:        Question on include/exclude and Journal


I have a client with a somewhat extensive include/exclude list for their
file servers. They also have the Journal service configured since most of
them are fairly large (object count), too. I've been searching, but is
there
any "recommendation" to have the include/exclude list in the Journal INI
file match the ones for the B/A client? Or would that just add too much
overhead to the journal service and increase your chances of the notify
buffer filling up and the journal being marked  invalid.

Any opinions?

Bill Boyer
"The ride is the goal, the destination is just the excuse!" -- ??

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ADSM-L] Fw: Question on include/exclude and Journal, Pete Tanenhaus <=