Could you explain why you feel the need to use disk pools vs
sequential disk files? We are going the route of sequential disk file
storage pools, and I haven't run across anything that would make me
want to keep disk pools for certain uses. Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Steven Harris <steve AT stevenharris DOT info>
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Conventional wisdom is that for TSM on Solaris, raw volumes are the way
> to go. I have 4 Sun X4540 servers each with 64GB of memory and 48x1TB
> internal SATA disks. The whole disk farm is one big ZFS zpool. TSM DB
> and Log are on external fast SAN disk.
>
> So far I've been using sequential file pools, but feel the need for some
> disk pools for windows directories and MSSQL Metadata. Is ZFS still as
> inefficient as UFS was for this purpose?
>
> Regards
>
> Steve.
>
> Steven Harris
> TSM Admin, Paraparaumu, NZ
>
--
Andy Carlson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamecube:$150,PSO:$50,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month,
The feeling of seeing the red box with the item you want in it:Priceless.
|