ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Estimating backups

2010-01-19 16:04:37
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Estimating backups
From: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:03:45 -0500
Looking for something that would preview the amount of data if I ran an
INCREMENTAL on the currently defined DOMAIN on the client. Preview just
gives me what would be included/excluded based on the filespec specified and
the current include/exclude list. I don't think this is really what they
want to do as it includes the whole filespace information from the TSM
server to compare/build lists. Been thinking about using -INCRBYDATE on the
systems that really don't qualify for a journal and also SKIPNTPERMISSIONS
to take that out of the equation.

Unless I configure them for the journal and use the unsupported utilities to
list out the journal and maybe massage it with Perl or something.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:12 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Estimating backups

On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Bill Boyer wrote:

> Is there a feature or tool available that you can run against a server and
> get an estimate on how much data will be backed up? ...

Try  dsmc PREview  and see if it provides the info you seek.

> I have a client that backs up file servers over a WAN link and some nights
> the backup doesn't complete in the window allowed. They  want a way to
know
> if the backup won't complete that night.

An in-client preview can't tell you how long a networked backup is going to
take or gauge the effects of a large Incremental contending for memory with
other apps in the client system, where paging can cripple a backup.  I'd
advise performing analysis to identify the slowest ingredients in your
backups and see if they can be addressed.  Exploration of journal-based
backups or target area backups may be in order.

   Richard Sims

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>