ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Administrative roles in the ISC 6.1 ISC

2009-08-25 11:15:38
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Administrative roles in the ISC 6.1 ISC
From: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:14:39 -0400
Dude.  Seriously.  Switch to the decaf.....

W   ;>)

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Strand, Neil B. <
NBStrand AT lmus.leggmason DOT com> wrote:

> Wanda !!!!
> If you are clueless, where does that leave the rest of us?  We depend on
> you to lead us out of the bowels of backups - navigating the good ship
> TSM.  How can we continue??? Where do we go?????
>
> Help - Richard, you are our last hope!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> OOOHHH NNOOOO, I feel the darkness of tar curling around my ankles.
> Cpio is just around the corner....waiting to snare us in an evil trap.
> Aaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrgggggg!
>
>
> Neil Strand
> Storage Engineer - Legg Mason
> Baltimore, MD.
> (410) 580-7491
> Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it.
> Boldness has genius, power and magic.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
> Wanda Prather
> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 11:13 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Administrative roles in the ISC 6.1 ISC
>
> Can somebody point me to doc on the definitions for authority roles for
> "administrative users" in the new 6.1 ISC?
>
> The choices are numerous:
>
> Administrator,Operator,
> Configurator,Monitor,Deployer,adminsecuritymanager,
> iscadmins,suppressmonitor,tsmAdministrator,tsmUser,reportAdministrator,r
> eportViewer
>
> Giving a user iscadmins authority does not give them the authority to
> create more administrative users like it does in 5.x.  So far I've
> resorted to giving new ISC users ALL the above authorities.  But I'd
> like to have some clue what I'm doing...
>
> IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason
> therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive
> information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers,
> account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely
> delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends
> that you do not send time sensitive
> or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
>
> This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged
> or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may
> not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this
> message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> author by replying to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank
> you.
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>