Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?
From:	Keith Arbogast <warbogas AT INDIANA DOT EDU>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:04:39 -0400

Wanda,
Thank you, that was very helpful.

Perhaps ALMS is intended primarily for non-TSM applications.  It
sounds like logical libraries are superfluous if TSM control points
are used correctly.  If I'm going too far with that, please let me know.

Best wishes,
Keith Arbogast

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Keith Arbogast Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Wanda Prather Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Keith Arbogast <= Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Paul Zarnowski Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, David Longo Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Alex Paschal Message not available Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Paul Zarnowski Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Bill Boyer Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, Len Boyle Re: [ADSM-L] ALMS benefit to shared-library management ?, David McClelland