ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a better way")

2009-07-09 09:50:39
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a better way")
From: Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT SAS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:49:16 -0400
 You are correct in that the TS3500 (3584)'s drive WWN are tied to the Drive 
Cage. But the serial number goes with the drive. But the FE are supposed to 
move the old drive's serial number into the replacement drives for LT03 and 
higher.



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Hart, Charles A
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:14 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a better way")

Dumb ? - But I was under the impression that the TS3500 (3584)'s drive
Serial Numbers were tied to the Drive Cage (rail) so the SN and WWN were
static... Maybe I'm thinking 3494 w/ 3592 Drives.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Baker, Jane
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:52 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a
better way")

 

We use LTO2 & LTO3 in a 3584 and the CE always sets the serial number to
match the old one so that we don't have this problem, same as Sean.

Regards,
Jane.



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Len Boyle
Sent: 08 July 2009 18:30
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a
better way")

In fact we found out that for lto-3 and lto-4 tape drives in an IBM 3584
library,  it is required that they change the serial number to match the
old tape drive. Because IBM tracks the drives by serial number for maint
contracts. This we found when the serial numbers that we send in for a
maint contract renewal were kicked out as field engineering  had not
been updating the serial numbers. But not for lto-2 tape drives.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Sean English
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:47 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a
better way")

Zoltan,

The majority of our TSM servers are AIX and we do have a setup where we
share multiple library clients with one library.  When we have IBM CEs
come out and replace drives, they just change the serial number on the
new drive to match the old drive they are replacing.  Apparently there
is a way to do that on the drive itself.

Thanks,
Sean






Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
07/08/2009 11:30 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Replacing tape drives (or "there has to be a better way")






I need thoughts/suggestions/help on how to deal with SAN attached tape
drive replacements when a library is shared amongst 5-servers.

We just has a drive replaced, therefore giving us a new serial number
(3494ATL - TS1130).  All servers that use these drives/libraries are
RedHat Linux and use very current lin_tape drivers.

Currently, the method we use is to bounce each server so the system
rescans the SAN and gets the new serial number.

In the past, just stopping the TSM server and then restarting the
lin_tape driver would often be enough. Now with the latest lin_tape
drivers, I don't see the lin_taped daemon running any more.

Yes, I have tried updating the paths on the library manager server and
telling it to autodetect but that didn't help.

There has to be a better way!  If you have a similar configuration, how
do you handle this scenario?


Please check that this email is addressed to you. If not, you should
delete it immediately as its contents may be confidential and its
disclosure, copying or distribution unlawful.

C. & J. Clark International Limited takes steps to prevent the
transmission of electronic viruses but responsibility for screening
incoming messages and the risk of such transmission lies with the
recipient.

C. & J. Clark International Limited Trading as Clarks Registered in
England number 141015.
Registered office 40 High Street, Street, Somerset. BA16 0EQ. England.

This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com

This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>