Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon
2009-03-24 15:33:31
On Mar 24, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Kauffman, Tom wrote:
The TSM database is about 30 GB used of 46 GB assigned. We have a
sub-rate T1 to our hot-site, with an RS-6000 installed. We are
currently running mksysb images out to the system with rsync; they
run to about 4.7 GB each and take about 1.2 hours. They also put
enough load on the corporate internet link that we can only run them
from 19:00 to 05:30 local time.
rsync, at least modern versions, have a bandwidth limiter option.
We store our database copies offsite using rsync (to a Solaris box
running ZFS with compression; with gzip compression enabled we're
seeing compression ratios of around 8.5x).
You could also consider other places to stash your database if you
have a better connection to the 'net than your DR site. There are
companies that provide remote rsync space, joyent comes to mind, or
even amazon's s3 storage (not rsync). I don't work in the Corporate
World so I have the flexibility to use those tools; YMMV.
--Jim
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Nick Laflamme
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, David E Ehresman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Wanda Prather
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Strand, Neil B.
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon,
Jim Zajkowski <=
Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Nick Laflamme
[ADSM-L] Not too risky.... ( was Re: Dear Tuscon ), Allen S. Rout
Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon, Remco Post
|
|
|