ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon

2009-03-20 16:39:43
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Dear Tuscon
From: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:38:02 -0400
I go a step further - I want the ability to cut two matching copies of the 
database backup to two tapes simultaneously. I'm currently running two backups 
back-to-back, but I'm unable to have sessions disabled for 40 minutes, so they 
are NOT identical backups.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Wanda Prather
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:24 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Dear Tuscon

I agree.  I want my TSM DB backup on the MOST RELIABLE MEDIA/DEVICE I CAN
GET.
If you EVER need that DB backup tape, it's because you are already in deep
do-do, and in a hurry to fix it.  The last thing you'll want to deal with is
the risk of encountering an I/O error on a DB restore...

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, David E Ehresman
<deehre01 AT louisville DOT edu>wrote:

> Gee. Our 3592 tapes cost somewhere around 100 dollars.  We keep 5 days
> worth of TSM DB backups.  $500 is real cheap in order to keep a copy of our
> most important DR resource on our most reliable backup medium.
>
> David Ehresman
> University of Louisville
>
> >>> Nick Laflamme <dplaflamme AT GMAIL DOT COM> 3/20/2009 10:39 AM >>>
> My heart leapt when my RSS reader presented me an article in the TSM
> udpates feed from IBM with the heading, "Keeping more than one TSM
> server database backup on a tape." As I'm implementing a new server
> using 3592 drives, I haven't been happy with my options for this
> particular issue. Maybe, I thought, I was about to learn something of
> immediate use and high value!
>
> My heart sank when I read the actual article, which might be
> paraphrased as, "Sorry, Charlie, too risky."
>
> Back to asking for some LTO drives just for small, inexpensive tapes
> for DB backups.
>


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>