ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Windows PIT Restore issues

2009-02-27 11:22:56
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows PIT Restore issues
From: Buddy Howeth <BHoweth AT PCOASTP DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:16:28 -0800
Instead of doing a point in time, show active/inactive files and then you
will see all the objects.  You can then sort by date within the folders
you are looking at


Buddy Howeth
Computer Operations Specialist
Information Systems
Pacific Coast Producers
Corporate Offices
631 N. Cluff Ave
Lodi, CA  95240-0756
(209) 367-8800 - Main#
(209) 367-6288 - Computer Room
(209) 366-6240 - Alpha Pager





Kevin Boatright <boatrke1 AT MEMORIALHEALTH DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
02/27/2009 08:16 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Windows PIT Restore issues






Attempting to do a point in time restore on a windows 2003 server using
the Gui client.  If I go back more than one day, I do not see all of the
folders in the root of the drive.  I see four out of eight folders.

TSM Client version 5.3.4.8
TSM Server version 5.3.4.2

Performing a point in time restore from the command line works fine.  I
can see all of the folders.

I was thinking it may have something to do with the management class bound
to the folders.

select class_name from backups where node_name='NODENAME' and type='DIR'
group by class_name

CLASS_NAME
------------------
MC7YR


MC7YR Management class details
Versions Data Exists           2
Version Data Deleted          1
Retain Extra Versions          30
Retain Only Version             2600


Anyone seen this behavior?

Thanks,
Kevin

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>