ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] New TSM Layout

2008-07-31 10:32:51
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] New TSM Layout
From: Adrian Compton <acompton AT ASPENPHARMA DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:29:06 +0200
Hi 

I would stick to 100GB diskpool volumes as many as you require.
Its not necessary to split into different LUNS as the SAN takes care of
itself and it is RAID 5 hopefully.

I have learnt to keep to smaller logical units for every thing in TSM.
Makes for better management and migration etc.

Regards

 
 
Adrian Compton
Aspen Pharmacare Port Elizabeth
tel: +2741 4072855
Fax: +2741 453 7452
Cell: +27823204495
Email: acompton AT aspenpharma DOT com

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Dollens, Bruce
Sent: 31 July 2008 16:16 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] New TSM Layout

We are in the process of designing our new TSM server. As part of this
we are also going to give it new SAN drive space. 

 

Currently we have 661 Gig in our disk pool and we are upping that to 900
Gig. What our questions is how should we partition that? Our current
pool is in 7 partitions but I was thinking more like 3 or 4 partitions.
Are there any pro's/con's with going with fewer disk partitions?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>