ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] VTL and TSM - Hyper Reclamation ????

2008-06-04 11:54:35
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] VTL and TSM - Hyper Reclamation ????
From: "Schneider, Jim" <jschneider AT USSCO DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:52:37 -0500
We run ours at 25% except one pool that we reclaim at 5%.  Really, 5%.
We ran incrementals direct to VTL with 30 servers backing up at one
time, each to a separate virtual tape.  Pool utilization was about 42%
but %Migratable was at 93%.  All those virtual 100 GB tapes with 1.2%
utilization messed with the statistics.  We had incremental backup
failures when automigration kicked in.  The data went to the secondary
storage pool and we didn't have enough physical drives to handle the
backup load.  I used 'move data' commands to consolidate the data but
instead of stacking data on used tape it started writing to
recently-emptied tapes.  We've reverted to backing up incremental data
to disk and migrating to VTL.

More whining available upon request.

Jim Schneider

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Andy Huebner
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:47 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] VTL and TSM - Hyper Reclamation ????

We run ours at 50%.  One thing to consider is whether your server and
VTL will have the bandwidth to reclaim at those percentages.

Andy Huebner
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:08 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] VTL and TSM - Hyper Reclamation ????

We are investigating VTL's as a replacement for our 3494 libraries.
A vendor was describing their sizing calculations and
assumptions.  One of their assumptions BLEW US AWAY!!  The
vendor recommended that reclamation  be done
on VTL volumes at a 20-30% Reclamation Percentage.  YES,
that's right, they recommend that a volume get reclaimed
when only 20-30% of the data is expired.  They claim that
this is possible due to the efficiencies and speed
of the VTL, and thus allow us to run at a much higher
average utilization.  The argument is that with a
higher average utilization we can purchase less disk, and
thus a less expensive VTL.

Currently, for our tapes, we reclaim at 55-60%.

Q)  Has anyone every heard of performing
reclamation at a percentage as low as 20-30%?

Q)  Is anyone with a VTL actually performing
reclamation at 20-30%?

Thanks!

Rick


-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an
authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited
from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or
its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of
this message and any attachments.
Thank you.