Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
2008-04-17 08:34:00
We look at dedup VTL as a possible target for active storage pools
containing ordinary file backup. This way we don't risk very much if the
VTL breaks or the VTL's dedup index goes corrupt. I am a little
sceptical about the robustness of these products so I will not let these
VTL's play a too significant role in our setup. My sceptisism may of
course be totally unfounded.
For TDP-data which are written and read in large sequential chunks, tape
is just fine performance and cost wise. From what I have heard, it can
be hard to obtain any decent dedup compression for Oracle with dedup
VTLs and the performance is questionable.
Best regards
Hans Chr.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:13 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: TSM being abandoned?
A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses
migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do you think this is true? My
concern is that the pool of support techs will shrink and put us in a
bind.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston
<html><body><br /><br /><br /><font face="Arial" size="1"><hr>This email
originates from Steria AS, Biskop Gunnerus' gate 14a, N-0051 OSLO,
http://www.steria.no. This email and any attachments may contain
confidential/intellectual property/copyright information and is only for the
use of the addressee(s). You are prohibited from copying, forwarding,
disclosing, saving or otherwise using it in any way if you are not the
addressee(s) or responsible for delivery. If you receive this email by mistake,
please advise the sender and cancel it immediately. Steria may monitor the
content of emails within its network to ensure compliance with its policies and
procedures. Any email is susceptible to alteration and its integrity cannot be
assured. Steria shall not be liable if the message is altered, modified,
falsified, or even edited.</font></body></html>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, (continued)
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Colwell, William F.
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Strand, Neil B.
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Howard Coles
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Timothy Hughes
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Colwell, William F.
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Kamran Rao
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?,
Hans Christian Riksheim <=
- [ADSM-L] What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?", Henrik Vahlstedt
- Re: [ADSM-L] What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?", Curtis Preston
- Re: [ADSM-L] What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?", Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?", Hans Christian Riksheim
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Bell, Charles (Chip)
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?, Howard Coles
|
|
|