We're looking at the same process except we are
running TSM 5.3.4 on AIX. We share a 3494 library with
a z800 (no TSM on the Z). We had IBM in the other day
to dicuss this and they said we needed a MES upgrade
of our 3494 in order for us to be able to use the 3592
drives we use in order to turn encryption on.
As far as Sungurad goes you need to check with them to
see if they can provide a 3494 configured the way IBM
needs it configured in order for your DR tests to be
valid.
--- ADSM-L automatic digest system
<LISTSERV AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote:
> There are 7 messages totalling 185 lines in this
> issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
> 1. Server-Server Communication and remote vault
> 2. unsubscribe (3)
> 3. TSM client schedule (2)
> 4. TS1120 encryption
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:01:51 +0500
> From: Muhammad Sadat Anwar <sadi AT SUPER.NET DOT PK>
> Subject: Re: Server-Server Communication and remote
> vault
>
> Dear Orville,
> :), it is Mbits/sec...:):) so it would take months
> to complete the process.. does not seem workable..
> Thanks for your help !
>
> Sadat
>
> Orville Lantto wrote:
>
> > If your link is truly 1 MByte/sec, this transfer
> will take over four days. If 1 Mbit/sec, it will
> take over one month. Plus, there is a good chance
> that the data will have at least one error in it,
> requiring an equally lengthy "Reconcile" process.
> >
> > If this is a one time situation, and you have the
> time, you can probably make this work. Sending
> tapes is probably a better and more sure option.
> >
> > Orville L. Lantto
> >
> > From: Muhammad Sadat Anwar
> > Sent: Mon 12/24/2007 01:26
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and
> remote vault
> >
> > Dear All,
> > Greetings !
> >
> > Running TSM 5.2.3 (will upgrade shortly) and file
> server on Windows 2003
> > platform on all locations.
> >
> > The problem:
> > 1- We want our 350GB File data to replicate in
> other city over WAN link of 1MB.
> > 2- Management do not want to purchase other
> software for replication.
> >
> > Solution in my mind:
> > 1- Backup as usual with Tivoli.
> > 2- Make server to server connection with Tivoli
> Server in other city
> > 3- Send data across to that server for remote
> vault
> > 4- Restore from this remote vault to file server
> in that city.
> >
> > How workable this would be?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Sadat
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:05:47 -0000
> From: Mathur Nitin
> <Nitin.Mathur AT BARCLAYCARD.CO DOT UK>
> Subject: unsubscribe
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
> intended solely for th=
> e addressee and may also be privileged or exempt
> from disclosure under appl=
> icable law. If you are not the addressee, or have
> received this e-mail in e=
> rror, please notify the sender immediately, delete
> it from your system and =
> do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part
> of this e-mail or its =
> attachments.
>
> Internet communications are not guaranteed to be
> secure or virus-free. The =
> Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for
> any loss arising from una=
> uthorised access to, or interference with, any
> Internet communications by a=
> ny third party, or from the transmission of any
> viruses. Replies to this e-=
> mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for
> operational or business rea=
> sons.
>
> Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or
> its attachments that doe=
> s not relate to the business of the Barclays Group
> is personal to the sende=
> r and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays
> Group.
>
> Barclaycard is a trading name of Barclays Bank Plc.
>
> Barclays Bank Plc. Registered in England and Wales
> (registered no. 1026167).
> Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14
> 5HP, United Kingdom.
>
> Barclays Bank Plc. is authorised and regulated by
> the Financial Services Au=
> thority.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:00:22 -0800
> From: Richard Taylor <rty AT CO.CLARK.NV DOT US>
> Subject: unsubscribe
>
> =20
> =20
> The task completed
> The paycheck has all been spent
> All that's left is pride...
> =20
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:32:27 -0800
> From: chayann <tsm-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
> Subject: TSM client schedule
>
> I am new to IBM TSM server - some one pl tell me how
> to do a client schedule in the TSM client- and what
> is the steps.
>
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by chayanmahalanabish AT gmail DOT com via
> Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:44:05 -0500
> From: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: TSM client schedule
>
> On Dec 26, 2007, at 6:32 AM, chayann wrote:
>
> > I am new to IBM TSM server - some one pl tell me
> how to do a client
> > schedule in the TSM client- and what is the steps.
> >
>
> Client schedules are defined in the TSM server,
> causing an enduring
> client process ('dsmc schedule' or 'dsmcad') to
> cause initiation of an
> action defined in the schedule. The use of
> schedules is described in
> your client manual, and the TSM server
> Administration Guide manual.
> Formal manuals can be found at:
>
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp
>
> You would also benefit from the TSM Concepts
> redbook, which you can
> find at www.ibm.com/redbooks.
>
> Richard Sims
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:41:13 -0500
> From: Wladimir Benavides
> <Wbenavides AT BINARIA.COM DOT EC>
> Subject: unsubscribe
>
> Wladimir Benavides
>
wbenavides AT binaria.com DOT ec<mailto:wbenavides AT binaria.com DOT ec>
> BINARIA
>
>
>
> El servicio de Symantec Hosted Mail Security ha
> verificado que el mensaje s=
> e =20
> encuentra libre de Virus.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:34:18 -0500
> From: Thomas Denier
> <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG>
> Subject: TS1120 encryption
>
> My co-workers and I have been asked to estimate the
> cost of encrypting
> TSM tapes that are sent to our offsite vault. One of
> the options we
> are examining is purchasing some TS1120 tape drives
> and installing
> them in our existing 3494 tape library.
>
> Our TSM server runs under SLES 9 Linux on a zSeries
> mainframe. The
> server level is currently 5.3.4.0, but it will
> probably be upgraded
> to 5.4 in the next few months.
>
> Is it possible to use library managed encryption
> with our combination
> of library and server platform? Is it possible to
> use system managed
> encryption with our combination of library and
> platform?
>
> We have a hot site contract with SunGard. We have
> always run our
> annual tests at the Philadelphia location, but we
> could be sent to
> another city if we declared a disaster and the
> Philadelphia site
> was being used by another customer. Can SunGard
> provide TS1120 tape
> drives with encryption capability?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of ADSM-L Digest - 25 Dec 2007 to 26 Dec 2007
> (#2007-324)
>
*************************************************************
>
Thank you,
Bob Molerio
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
|
