Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
2007-12-04 21:29:52
Yes, but it's not position in the dsm.opt file that matters when client
option sets are at issue. Use "dsmc query inclexcl" to see the final list
that TSM actually uses.
I suspect it is that client option set that is overriding the dsm.opt
file.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 11/29/2007
02:41:26 PM:
> Andy,
>
> His additions are at the bottom of his dsm.opt file. There is also a
> client optionset that has:
>
> Include ?:* FILESERVER
>
>
>
> Fred Johanson
> TSM Administrator
> University of Chicago
>
> 773-702-8464
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> Andrew Raibeck
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:29 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class
>
> Nothing wrong per se, although the second INCLUDE appears redundant.
>
> The first place to start with these kinds of issues is to use "dsmc
> query
> inclexcl" to makes sure those files aren't being picked up by an earlier
> filter.
>
> Also make sure the updated policy was activated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
> Level 3 Team Lead
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
> Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
> http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan
> ager.html
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 11/29/2007
> 01:23:35 PM:
>
> > Our desktop support unit has a user that wants a new retention policy
> on
> > their file share. The admin added this to the dsm.opt:
> >
> > INCLUDE "F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget
> Office\*"
> > LONGADMIN
> > INCLUDE "F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget
> > Office\*.*" LONGADMIN
> >
> > I can't see anything syntactically wrong, but it does not work. He's
> > also tried 'f:...' with no effect. He says that he's restarted the
> > service after each change.
> >
> > Can anyone see his error?
> >
> > Fred Johanson
> > TSM Administrator
> > University of Chicago
> >
> > 773-702-8464
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Richard Sims
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class,
Andrew Raibeck <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Strand, Neil B.
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class, Fred Johanson
|
|
|