ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Migration question

2007-10-02 11:37:08
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration question
From: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:34:41 -0400
Is there really recomended sequence every TSM Environment should follow?
Or does it depend on your Individual environmental needs?

Tim




Larry Clark wrote:
1- backups nodes
2- backup primary disk pools to tape (copypool)
3- migrate primary disk pool to tape
4- backup primary tape pool to tape (copypool) ( this allows picking up files to copypool not completed in 2 before 3 was triggered)
5- db backup
6- expiration
7- reclaim primary tape pool
8- reclaim copy pool

----- Original Message ----- From: "CAYE PIERRE" <Pierre.Caye AT ALCATEL-LUCENT DOT FR>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration question


May I suggest a sequence ?

1- backups nodes
2- backup primary disk pools to tape
3- backup primary tape pool to tape
4- migrate primary disk pool
5- db backup
6- expiration
7- reclaim primary tape pool
8- reclaim copy pool

Pierre

-----Message d'origine-----
De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] De
la part de Dollens, Bruce
Envoyé : lundi 1 octobre 2007 18:36
À : ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Objet : [ADSM-L] Migration question

I have a question that I feel a little stupid in asking.

What is the difference between migration and backup primary
(disk) to copy (tape)?

I am working on changing my scheduling up and the recommended
order of steps I was given is:

Backup clients
Migration
Backup primary to copy
Backup db
Expiration
Reclamation
Start all over again

Thanks!