ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] SQL TDP in MSCLuster

2007-09-04 22:27:26
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL TDP in MSCLuster
From: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 21:20:43 -0500
Well, now we are at the point that MaxTransferSize is an MSSQL parameter, but 
it is controlled by the TDP.  If that is the case, how is it generated?  The 
only thing that I can come up with is that the value generated is 4xLogBufSize.
 
Any hhhelp at navigating this rabbithole is greatly appreciated.

________________________________

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Richard Sims
Sent: Sat 9/1/2007 2:48 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL TDP in MSCLuster



On Aug 31, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Fred Johanson wrote:

> ...The DBA is sure he has found the solution.  When he starts the
> backup, this is the generated command:
>
> BACKUP failed to complete the command USE master BACKUP DATABASE
> [ProdDB] TO VIRTUAL_DEVICE=N'TDPSQL-000017B8-0000' WITH
> BLOCKSIZE=512, MAXTRANSFERSIZE=1048576, NAME=N'full',
> DESCRIPTION=N'TDPSQL-000017B8-0000 (TDP MS SQL V2)'
>
> He's convinced the problem is with the MAXTRANSFERSIZE.  If I would
> change that, everything would work.  But it's not a TSM parameter.
> He says it doesn't appear in MSSQL either.  So where does this come
> from?  Is it really the culprit?  Support hasn't been very
> supportive so far, prefering to concentrate on the cluster.

Hi, Fred -

One wonders if the DBA did any research in his assigned area, in that
info on the MS SQL MaxTransferSize parameter is readily available, as
in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/873482 , where the value in play
looks nominal.

There have to be some messages somewhere saying why the backup
failed, as the basis for actual problem pursuit.

    Richard Sims

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>