ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ADSM-L] Occupancy vs. backups table file count

2007-08-23 17:27:19
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Occupancy vs. backups table file count
From: Michael Bartl <michael.bartl AT SPACE DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:25:29 +0200 
Kathleen,
I've never tried this, but 10% difference is quite a lot.

I think of some possible reasons:
- Does one of the tables count directories as files while the other
skips them?
- Does one table reflect an older state than the other (like "aud
lic" updates the auditoccupancy)?
- Does the caching after migration (if active) lead to files counted
twice?

Just a few ideas, maybe I'm completely wrong...

Best regards,
Michael
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] First Backup day, Shawn Drew
Next by Date:  [ADSM-L] Suad Musovich/New Zealand/IBM away until Monday 3rd September, Suad Musovich
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] Occupancy vs. backups table file count, Richard Sims
Next by Thread:  [ADSM-L] Suad Musovich/New Zealand/IBM away until Monday 3rd September, Suad Musovich
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]