ADSM-L

Re: Litigation! Wish

2006-12-25 23:40:49
Subject: Re: Litigation! Wish
From: Orin Rehorst <rehorst AT POHA DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:40:49 -0600
Thank you, Robin, for the confirmation of my suspicion. I understand
"special" (second) backups with different parameters. Can you give me an
example of "or data movements within the server?"

TIA
Orin Rehorst

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Robin Sharpe
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 8:55 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Litigation! Wish

Yes, this is a major shortcoming of TSM, especially in today's litigious
business climate:  the fact that data retention in TSM is tied to
Management Class/Copy Group, and is the same throughout the storage
hierarchy and across storage pool backups.   The only way around it is
to
perform additional "special" backups and/or data movement within the
server.

Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs



             Orin Rehorst
             <rehorst AT POHA DOT COM
             >
To
             Sent by: "ADSM:           ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
             Dist Stor
cc
             Manager"
             <[email protected]
Subject
             .EDU>                     Litigation! Wish


             12/20/2006 09:57
             AM


             Please respond to
             "ADSM: Dist Stor
                 Manager"
             <[email protected]
                   .EDU>






Added VTL to increase capacity.

Dream wish: set Version Data Exists to 20 for vtlpool and to 2 for
copypool.

No way to accomplish that (there isn't a Santa, after all)?

TIA
Orin Rehorst

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>