You should know that many MC's can be defined in a single PD;  read
about this in online help for the DEFINE MGMTCLAS cmd.  See, also,
the client option definition for INCLUDE -- the unique format used to
associate a different MC with various filename/filetype patterms.

Regards,
Don

-------------- Original message from "RODOLFICH, NICHOLAS" <NICHOLAS.RODOLFICH 
AT SCPPOOL DOT COM>: -------------- 


> How is this possible? Only 2 copy groups can be present in a MC. Only 
> one policy set within a policy domain can be active at a time. I don't 
> see how it can be done in the same policy domain. Could you be more 
> specific? 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Nicholas 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of 
> Don France 
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:16 PM 
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] backup destination change possible? 
> 
> You could use management class within the same PD; the same 
> way you'd use a different MC for incrementals or differentials (ie, 
> the logs), just add the appropriate INCLUDE statement in their opt file. 
> 
> Also, consider sending the disk_mc data to a storage pool that migrates 
> to the same tapepool as the other, direct-to-tape TDP nodes (to keep 
> all the TDP data in the same tape pool, for expiration/reclamation 
> efficiency). 
> 
> Don France