ADSM-L

Re: win tsm client domain option

2006-10-17 15:30:42
Subject: Re: win tsm client domain option
From: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:29:11 -0600
APAR IC50859 has been opened for this issue.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 10/17/2006
11:40:24 AM:

> I agree it is redundant.
> I dont' know why, but the client started doing it that way at the 5.3.0.
>
> Harmless, unless someone reconfigures the box and removes E:.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Richard Rhodes
> Sent: Fri 10/13/2006 3:21 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: win tsm client domain option
>
>
>
> I don't have access to our windows servers, so I don't know what this
> actually looks like,
> but I'll relay what the win admin told me.
>
> He is configuring a win tsm client (v5.3.3).  He used the gui config
tool
> to set the domain.
> He says he told it to do all-local drives.  When he went to inspect the
> dsm.opt file, he
> foound the following . . .
>
>   domain c:
>   domain e:
>   domain systemservices
>   domain systemstate
>   domain all-local
>
> Yes . . .5 separate domain lines.  c: and e are the local drives.
>
> I understand that the lines are additive, that is, this is the same as
>    domain c: e: systemservices systemstate all-local
>
> Question:  Is this correct - that it puts in specific drive letters but
> also the all-local?
>
> That seems redundant.  It also seem completely unneeded since the
default
> with
> no domain clause is all-local which also does the system state stuff.
>
> Does this seem correct?
>
> thanks
>
> rick
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
> and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
> the original message.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>