ADSM-L

Re: MAXNUMMP

2006-09-14 13:12:22
Subject: Re: MAXNUMMP
From: Anker Lerret <ADSM-L AT LERRET DOT US>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:11:29 -0400
Thanks for the responses...good stuff.

> Perhaps you have your
> resourceutilization set to greater than 1 and your management class/copy
> group is sending the data directly to tape.

Is there a reason to set resourceutilization to more than one if a backup
is performing OK?  To put it differently: is "resourceutilization 1"
always a safe value?

You also mentioned setting a value in the COPYPOOL parameter on the
storage pool.  Does that mean that if I use COPYPOOLs that I have to go
through all the TSM nodes and increase their MAXNUMMP by the number of
COPYPOOLs?

anker

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>