|
Re: To DirMC, or not to DirMC
2006-07-22 04:42:46
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 01:10:19AM +0200, Remco Post wrote:
> This was discussed at Oxford last year. I don't recall the outcome. I do
> recall that because TSM allocates 256k chunks minimum for a transaction,
> you do not really want to use this feature since TSM v5.3.
Isn't this only for sequential access volumes?
--
Jurjen Oskam
Savage's Law of Expediency:
You want it bad, you'll get it bad.
|
|
|
