ADSM-L

Re: AW: TDP for Exchange - Management Class

2006-05-22 08:40:47
Subject: Re: AW: TDP for Exchange - Management Class
From: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:40:27 -0400
This information is not correct.
You can schedule a Data Protection for Exchange node.
Use the ACTION=COMMAND type schedule.
There is an appendix in the Data Protection for Exchange
User's Guide that shows you exactly how to do it.

Thanks,

Del

----------------------------------------------------

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 05/20/2006
10:16:04 AM:

> Actually you will need a fourth node to provide scheduling. The TDP for
> mail cannot be schedule, only the backup archive client could be
> schedule.  You would schedule the BAC to issue a command to start the
> TDP.  Actually I update my exchange nodes once a week to a different
> domain to force it to use a different storage pool, but the retention is
> the same for both policy domain. This is to force the creation of an
> offsite copy of the exchange data once a week.  This is adequate for my
> office, so your mileage may vary.  We also only have weekly Iron
> Mountain pickups.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Hi ,
>
> Became  a little bit confusing ..... So What the purpose of many
> management class per node utility If can't use for this purpose describe
> ?????
>
> Domain            Nodename     Mgm            Include
> Schedule           Opt File
>
> Domain_Exchange   Exchange     EXCH_daily     INCLUDE "*\...\full"
> EXCH_daily       Sched_Exch_daily     dsm.opt         (Default)
> Domain_Exchange   Exchange     EXCH_monthly   INCLUDE "*\...\full"
> EXCH_monthly     Sched_Exch_montly    dsm_monthly.opt
> Domain_Exchange   Exchange     EXCH_yearly    INCLUDE "*\...\full"
> EXCH_yearly      Sched_Exch_yearly    dsm_yearly.opt
>
> If I understand correctly with this configuration every backup the files
> will be rebinding to the MGM in action !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> And the only way to achieve it , is to create also 3 different nodenames
> ..... Correct
>
> So wasteful !!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Regards Robert Ouzen